In a column slated to appear in the August 20th print edition of Time Magazine, Fareed Zakaria explains that we have so many more horrific gun killings in the United States than any place else on earth -- not because we have more crazy people but because we make it easier than any other country for just about anyone to acquire a gun.
And we make it so easy for two reasons. First, in the face of this obvious causality, otherwise intelligent people abandon thought in favor of mindless political dogma. Second, the gun lobby has sold the public on an interpretation of the Second Amendment that is a bogus departure from how the country controlled guns from the earliest days of the Republic. As conservative Chief Justice Warren Burger put it after he retired, "one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word fraud--on the American
public by special-interest groups that I have ever seen in my
lifetime."
Zakaria's excellent column follows.
After the ghastly act of terrorism against a Sikh temple in Wisconsin on Aug.
5, Americans are pondering how to stop gun violence. We have decided that it is,
in the words of New York Times columnist David Brooks, a problem of psychology,
not sociology. We are trying to fathom the evil ideology of Wade Michael Page.
Only several weeks ago, we were all trying to understand the twisted psychology
of James Holmes, the man who killed 12 innocents at a movie theater in Aurora,
Colo. Before that it was the mania of Jared Loughner, who shot Congresswoman
Gabby Giffords last year.
Certainly we should try to identify such people and help treat and track
them. But aside from the immense difficulty of such a task--there are millions
of fanatical, crazy people, and very few turn into mass murderers--it misses the
real problem.
Gun violence in America is off the chart compared with every other country on
the planet. The gun-homicide rate per capita in the U.S. is 30 times that of
Britain and Australia, 10 times that of India and four times that of
Switzerland. When confronted with such a large deviation, a scholar would ask,
Does America have some potential cause for this that is also off the chart? I
doubt that anyone seriously thinks we have 30 times as many crazy people as
Britain or Australia. But we do have many, many more guns.
There are 88.8 firearms per 100 people in the U.S. In second place is Yemen,
with 54.8, then Switzerland with 45.7 and Finland with 45.3. No other country
has a rate above 40. The U.S. handgun-ownership rate is 70% higher than that of
the country with the next highest rate.
The effect of the increasing ease with which Americans can buy ever more
deadly weapons is also obvious. Over the past few decades, crime has been
declining, except in one category. In the decade since 2000, violent-crime rates
have fallen by 20%, aggravated assault by 21%, motor-vehicle theft by 44.5% and
nonfirearm homicides by 22%. But the number of firearm homicides is essentially
unchanged. What can explain this anomaly except easier access to guns?
Confronted with this blindingly obvious causal connection, otherwise
intelligent people close their eyes. Denouncing any effort to control guns,
George Will explained on ABC News that he had "a tragic view of life, which is
that ... however meticulously you draft whatever statute you wind up passing,
the world is going to remain a broken place, and things like this are going to
happen." I don't recall Will responding to, say, the 9/11 attacks--or any other
law-and-order issue for that matter--with a "things happen" sentiment.
The other argument against any serious gun control is that it's
unconstitutional, an attempt to undo American history. In fact, something close
to the opposite is true.
Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the actual
history in Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Guns
were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the Republic. Laws that
banned the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in Kentucky and Louisiana
in 1813. Other states soon followed: Indiana in 1820, Tennessee and Virginia in
1838, Alabama in 1839 and Ohio in 1859. Similar laws were passed in Texas,
Florida and Oklahoma. As the governor of Texas (Texas!) explained in 1893, the
"mission of the concealed deadly weapon is murder. To check it is the duty of
every self-respecting, law-abiding man."
Congress passed the first set of federal laws regulating, licensing and
taxing guns in 1934. The act was challenged and went to the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1939. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's solicitor general, Robert H. Jackson, said
the Second Amendment grants people a right that "is not one which may be
utilized for private purposes but only one which exists where the arms are borne
in the militia or some other military organization provided for by law and
intended for the protection of the state." The court agreed unanimously.
Things started to change in the 1970s as various right-wing groups coalesced
to challenge gun control, overturning laws in state legislatures, Congress and
the courts. But Chief Justice Warren Burger, a conservative appointed by Richard
Nixon, described the new interpretation of the Second Amendment in an interview
after his tenure as "one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word
fraud--on the American public by special-interest groups that I have ever seen
in my lifetime."
So when people throw up their hands and say we can't do anything about guns,
tell them they're being un-American--and unintelligent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment